6 features Facebook could use
Facebook is high on functionality but rather low on accessibility. The recent redesign opens up a lot of possibilities for the service to make sure some of its best features come to the fore, thereby enhancing the whole Facebook experience.
I will try to list a few things they might want to do to make this happen.
Facebook Notes
The notes feature is one of the less-pimped features of Facebook. Most people’s Facebook notes only comprise of imported RSS feeds. I remember a discussion on Friendfeed (this was soon after the launch of Friendfeed’s realtime interface) where someone said the only thing missing was a means to do long-form blogging.
Facebook has always had this feature. But they need to play it up more. Perhaps it can be included in the list of things you can do with the new publisher tool? What’s more? You can upload notes from m.facebook.com as well. In my experience, notes can be a solid replacement for web journals, especially if you want to keep your posts within friends.
Email Posting
Facebook’s mobile site is among the best there are. But it doesn’t allow for posting of pictures. The only way I can post photos to my Facebook albums from my mobile is by MMS (an across the world, inter-continental MMS at that). Apart from being unreliable and slow, it is also costly.
Facebook should allow for posting of photos to the wall via email. While they are at it, they should also let me post notes by email.
More Feed Filters
I love the new live feed that has Facebook users across the world crying in anguish. I think it is a step in the right direction. But it needs to become more flexible. Facebook’s vast range of applications can make this feed richer than Twitter’s or Friendfeed’s can ever be. They should allow for EVERY type of item to show up on this feed. They should also allow the users to determine what they want to show in their personal feeds and what they don’t.

Currently there are only two options — either put up with someone’s updates, or ban them altogether.
Vanity URLs for Profiles
It is possible (and fashionable) for people to carry their Twitter URLs around in their heads, on their visiting cards or even in their heads (so they can shoot unsuspecting strangers with it). With Facebook, the only way I can tell someone about my profile is by giving him my email and/or asking him to search for me.
A simple URL like facebook.com/user or user.facebook.com or even facebook.com/members/pages/user will go a long way in opening Facebook up.
Tagging Users with Ease
One important factor behind the success of any publishing system is its ability to reach out to prospective readers. Newspapers advertised, blog posts linked and tracked back to other blog posts, Twitter lets users tag each other using a simple @username command. On Facebook notes, the tagging process is much less intuitive. True, photos and notes can be tagged. But tagging someone while writing a note is not possible.
If Facebook does go for vanity URLs, usernames might help in this regard. A @username or a #username might be converted into a link to the user’s profile.
A mega wall?
A large part of Twitter’s appeal lies in the tracking that their search service allows. Anything you can spell, you can track. The ‘trending topics’ section is a virtual heatmap of what theworld is talking about, right now. Facebook’s opening up its status message stream won’t do much good unless these little bits of text become part of a greater whole, like they did when Facebook tied up with CNN to broadcast President Obama’s swearing-in ceremony. Millions logged in and shared their thoughts on the historic moment.
It is that kind of global participation that I am talking about. And why only global? Why not local events? Why not allow uses to create pages to carry out live discussions on specific events and topics. On Twitter, all this requires is a hashtag. On Facebook…?




Nice post. I think Facebook has a lot more potential but I agree, it needs to give the organisation of the feed back to the user and stop nannying them. At least give an “advanced” option that gives back control.
Ryan Jarrett
19 Mar 09 at 12:32 am
Love the points except one.. easy tagging.. it makes sense on twitter as there is no direct comment feature for tweets, which is present on Facebook.
When it comes to notes, it tagging that important.. considering the number of friends in not as big as follower count on twitter?
Vijayendra Mohanty Reply:
March 19th, 2009 at 1:22 am
Ya but what if I want to mention soemeone in a status message? Or tag from my mobile phone?
| Balu |
19 Mar 09 at 1:12 am
[...] Vimoh’s Blog » 6 features Facebook could use (tags: socialnetworking facebook) [...]
links for 2009-03-20 « Unjustly
20 Mar 09 at 5:32 am
So you think orkut is better of accesibility and low of functionality , just opposite of facebook as you mention ?
Manish
http://www.jagoinvestor.com
Vijayendra Mohanty Reply:
March 20th, 2009 at 7:38 am
When did I say that?
Manish
20 Mar 09 at 5:52 am
I am asking your opinion ?
Manish
Vijayendra Mohanty Reply:
March 20th, 2009 at 7:47 am
Hmm… OK.
It is my considered opinion that Facebook and Orkut have started heading in different directions. Orkut may choose to follow Facebook, or it may not.
You are right, Orkut is low on social networking functional. Its current version is for the “log in once a week type”. It has apps and walls (think scrapbook) and status messages and other FB-like features but they have just been added following the trends and have not been thought through.
Manish
20 Mar 09 at 7:41 am
A great list of features you’ve mentioned. Somehow facebook isn’t working for me. The “Facebook Pages” is very restricted, meant for businesses etc. but can’t add any applications to it without having a profile. Yep, definitely low on accessibility.
The Comic Project
22 Mar 09 at 3:51 am
facebook is crappiest. A completely blank face and an empty book.
me
26 Mar 09 at 8:36 pm