<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 features Facebook could use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/</link>
	<description>simple ideas, simply put</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-431</guid>
		<description>facebook is crappiest. A completely blank face and an empty book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facebook is crappiest. A completely blank face and an empty book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Comic Project</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>The Comic Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-410</guid>
		<description>A great list of features you&#039;ve mentioned. Somehow facebook isn&#039;t working for me. The &quot;Facebook Pages&quot; is very restricted, meant for businesses etc. but can&#039;t add any applications to it without having a profile. Yep, definitely low on accessibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great list of features you&#8217;ve mentioned. Somehow facebook isn&#8217;t working for me. The &#8220;Facebook Pages&#8221; is very restricted, meant for businesses etc. but can&#8217;t add any applications to it without having a profile. Yep, definitely low on accessibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijayendra Mohanty</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijayendra Mohanty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Hmm... OK.

It is my considered opinion that Facebook and Orkut have started heading in different directions. Orkut may choose to follow Facebook, or it may not.

You are right, Orkut is low on social networking functional. Its current version is for the &quot;log in once a week type&quot;. It has apps and walls (think scrapbook) and status messages and other FB-like features but they have just been added following the trends and have not been thought through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; OK.</p>
<p>It is my considered opinion that Facebook and Orkut have started heading in different directions. Orkut may choose to follow Facebook, or it may not.</p>
<p>You are right, Orkut is low on social networking functional. Its current version is for the &#8220;log in once a week type&#8221;. It has apps and walls (think scrapbook) and status messages and other FB-like features but they have just been added following the trends and have not been thought through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I am asking your opinion ? 

Manish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am asking your opinion ? </p>
<p>Manish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijayendra Mohanty</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijayendra Mohanty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-402</guid>
		<description>When did I say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did I say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-401</guid>
		<description>So you think orkut is better of accesibility and low of functionality , just opposite of facebook as you mention ?

Manish
http://www.jagoinvestor.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you think orkut is better of accesibility and low of functionality , just opposite of facebook as you mention ?</p>
<p>Manish<br />
<a href="http://www.jagoinvestor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jagoinvestor.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-20 &#171; Unjustly</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-20 &#171; Unjustly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-400</guid>
		<description>[...] Vimoh’s Blog » 6 features Facebook could use (tags: socialnetworking facebook) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vimoh’s Blog » 6 features Facebook could use (tags: socialnetworking facebook) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijayendra Mohanty</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijayendra Mohanty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Ya but what if I want to mention soemeone in a status message? Or tag from my mobile phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya but what if I want to mention soemeone in a status message? Or tag from my mobile phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; Balu &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; Balu &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Love the points except one.. easy tagging.. it makes sense on twitter as there is no direct comment feature for tweets, which is present on Facebook. 
When it comes to notes, it tagging that important.. considering the number of friends in not as big as follower count on twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the points except one.. easy tagging.. it makes sense on twitter as there is no direct comment feature for tweets, which is present on Facebook.<br />
When it comes to notes, it tagging that important.. considering the number of friends in not as big as follower count on twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Jarrett</title>
		<link>http://www.vmohanty.com/2009/6-features-facebook-could-use/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Jarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmohanty.com/?p=377#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  I think Facebook has a lot more potential but I agree, it needs to give the organisation of the feed back to the user and stop nannying them.  At least give an &quot;advanced&quot; option that gives back control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  I think Facebook has a lot more potential but I agree, it needs to give the organisation of the feed back to the user and stop nannying them.  At least give an &#8220;advanced&#8221; option that gives back control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
