Dear NDTV and Barkha Dutt. Hope you are well, now that you have arm-twisted CKunte into submission.

Don’t get me wrong. You have as much right to sue people as I do. Especially when your reputations are at stake. But here are a few reasons why your approach may not be best suited to the present circumstances.

Following the terrorist attacks that happened in Mumbai on 26 November, 2008, many people took offence to the way Barkha Dutt reported the event. Her reporting was called “shoddy” and “irresponsible” (among other things).

If I were Barkha Dutt, I would be annoyed and probably even infuriated. Nobody blames you for that. Bloggers often fail to make the distinction between opinon and reality. And it must hurt to see someone sitting at home judging you, especially when you risk your life and limb to bring people news of dangerous situations as they happen.

But here’s something important: You are in the business of being judged by people sitting in their homes.

It might appear that you are not answerable to anyone. But you are answerable to your audience. You have feelings I understand, and slander is not to be tolerated, but you can’t pummel people into respecting your feelings.

And your audience isn’t the only section who thinks you failed. Following the Mumbai attacks, even the government of India suggested curbs to keep over zealous reporting in check. I am told journalists flocked to the authorities to have the measures revoked. I was relieved. Now I am back to square one.

You won’t achieve anything by getting one blogger to withdraw what he typed in the heat of anger. Just like the government of India wouldn’t have achieved anything by blocking one TV news channel.

You are only one news channel, but there are thousands of bloggers. And whether you like it or not, we have a voice. Images on the TV stay on for as long as you let them. On the web, things never die.

The ‘have lawyers will sue’ attitude won’t help. It will make things worse. For you, me, and everyone else.

‘We the people‘ are pissed. Do you care?

• When ‘free speech’ bears a price tag
• NDTV’s Assault on Free Speech
• On Bloggers, Slander, Freedom of Expression and other things…
• Blogger Silenced by NDTV (Desipundit compilation of other voices)
• NDTV – Self-righteous, ill-advised or both?

I know you are analytical & highly educated people, and have my best interests at heart. But you are also blind. Allow me to explain.

A band of murderers pops out of nowhere and kills a whole lot of everyday folks (just like me) and then send you a letter (or a video, or an email) telling you who they would like to be known as and who they represent and what they want.

You then, in your great wisdom, read their lies to the whole nation aloud (with flashy lights and exciting music in the background for added effect).

Please stop doing that! It is fucking irritating!

I, and many others like me, can do without their lies. And it irritates to see you repeat their lies for them.

Can’t you tell?

I don’t care what they are called. I don’t care where they are from. I don’t care who they think they are doing this for. They killed people – they are murderers.

Stop calling them Islamists or Hindus or activists or outfits. Words like ‘criminal’ and ‘murderer’ work just fine.

If they need to kill people to get the governments’ attention, then they don’t deserve ANY attention. In fact, I would go so far as to say that murderers don’t deserve freedom of speech.

I would love for them to be nameless and uncategorised. The whole lot of them undesirables. I would like them to be put away for life, with no one ever seeing them again, or hearing of from them, or hearing of them and their so-called ’cause’.

Update: I received an email in response to this post. Read it here.

Let me get this straight. You are honourable members of the Hindu faith who feel violated by Christian intruders’ attempts to turn honest and god-fearing Hindus (such as yourself) to their faith. That’s it, right?

May I ask you which tenets of Hinduism ask you to maim, murder, and humiliate unarmed people in order to defend the faith you so claim to love? Where in all of those oft-quoted religious texts does violence against the unarmed find mention as one of your weapons?

Are you sure it is your religion that is making you do this? Are you sure you are not doing this because you are a gutless, illiterate, psychopathic criminal? Are you sure you are not doing this because you enjoy the killing and the raping? Or maybe you know all this and still choose to blame it on your religion. Religions don’t talk back, do they?

You decide to go do some manhunting. You find there is no way you can do all that and still have claim to residence in civilised society. So you rev up the rhetoric and call forth other criminals like yourself. You hide behind political organisations and religious bodies and do your killing conveniently. Anyone who opposes you automatically becomes a faithless traitor (or to use a more fashionable phrase, a ‘pseudo-secularist’).

Here comes another crucial part of your motivation. You just want to hurt. You are angry at a lot of things in your life. But not enough to fight. So you carefully choose people who can’t fight back. Going out and out criminal will cause you to go against the law. You don’t want that. Joining the army includes considerable risk to life and limb. So that is out of the question as well. Why not take it out on the helpless and the weak? If someone raises their voice, you can always play the ‘defender of faith‘ card, right?

That, right there, is your little game.

Tell you what… I am done with you. From what I have read, Hinduism is hard to define. We don’t worship one god, nor many. We don’t abhor violence, neither do we embrace it. But if it comes right down to the dirty matter of choosing sides, you can count me out of your little criminal club.

You and I are not the same. If you are a Hindu, I am not. I wish I could claim Hinduism as my own private little garden, but then I would have to breathe the same air as you scum. I would rather remain faithless then have anything to do with you.